Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Dental pulp extracted from teeth may provide an abundant supply of highly proliferative, multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are multipotent mesenchymal stem cells that have self-renewal ability. They can differentiate into various cell types, including osteoblasts, chondroblasts, adipocytes, neurons, and so on [1-6]. These cells express mesenchymal lineage surface antigens such as CD105, CD90, CD73 while they do not express endothelial-hematopoietic antigens, like CD33, CD31, CD34, and CD11b [7, 8]. MSCs can inhibit innate and adaptive immune response through producing anti-inflammatory mediators. Recent studies revealed that MSCs-conditioned medium (CM) had the essential features of mesenchymal stem cells. MSCs-CM possess immunomodulatory properties and can suppress immune reactions [9-12]. MSC-CM contains anti-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and soluble mediators, which can lead to the inhibition of immune cells proliferation, including peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) [13, 14]. In the present study, we analyzed DPSCs-CM immunosuppressive effects on the proliferation of allogeneic PBMCs.
Materials and Methods
Isolation of dental pulp stem cells and cell culture
A wisdom tooth was extracted from a healthy donor during routine dental extraction with the approval of the ethical board of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran. The pulp tissue was extracted and digested in a solution of 3 mg/mL collagenase type I (Sigma, Germany) for 40 min at 37°C. The cells were centrifuged and seeded in culture flasks. Cells cultured in a-MEM supplemented with (15%) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin-G and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Biosera, Germany), and cultured at 37°C.
Flow cytometry analysis
DPSCs at passage 3 were used for surface markers analyses. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using the following monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); anti-CD105, anti-CD73, anti-CD90, anti-CD14, anti-CD-34, and anti-CD45.
In vitro differentiation
For osteogenic differentiation, 3×103 cells were cultured in 24-well plates. Osteogenic medium consisting of low-glucose DMEM (Biosera, Germany) with (10%) FBS, 100 nM dexamethasone, 0.2mM-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 10mM b-glycerophosphate (all from Sigma) and 100 U/mL penicillin with 1000 U/mL streptomycin. After 21 days of culture, the cells were stained with Alizarin Red to the determined mineralized matrix.
DPSC conditioned medium preparation
For collecting the conditioned medium, DPSCs at passage 3 were incubated in serum-deprived DMEM for 8 hours in 37ºC and (5%) CO2. MSCs-CM were sucked and centrifuged at 1600 rpm for 5 minutes to remove detached cells.
BrdU Proliferation assay
PBMCs were separated from the fresh blood of a healthy donor with Ficoll (Biosera, Germany). Around 1×105 PBMCs were seeded in 96-cell culture plates (SPL, Korea). The cells were stimulated with (1.5%) PHA (Phytohaemagglutinin, Gibco, Germany) and cultured with (50%) DPSC-CM and (50%) RPMI 1640 (Biosera, Germany) supplemented with (10%) FBS for 24, 48, and 72 hours. After incubation, BrdU assay (Roche, Germany) was performed to determine the proliferation of PBMCs.
Statistical analysis
All study experiments were performed three times. All statistics were done using SPSS V. 25 (SPSS Inc.). For multiple comparisons, one-way ANOVA was used. Values of (PResults
Cell surface marker characteristics of DPSCs
The cell surface markers of DPSCs were characterized by flow cytometry analysis (Figure 1). DPSCs expressed mesenchymal stem cells surface markers. They were strongly positive for CD105, CD90, and CD73. DPSCs were negative for CD34, CD14, and CD45.
Differentiation potential of DPSCs
To determine the differentiation potential of DPSCs, the cells were incubated in osteogenic and adipogenic culture mediums. Following 3 weeks of culture, the cells were stained and observed under a microscope.
Under osteogenic differentiation, the calcified deposits are formed (Figure 1). DPSCs were also cultured in adipogenic medium. After staining with Oil Red O, the lipid vacuoles were observed (Figure 1).
Effects of DPSCs conditioned medium on the proliferation of PBMC
BrdU results showed that proliferation of stimulated and non-stimulated PBMCs reduced significantly (P
Discussion
In the current study, we examined the immunomodulatory effect of conditioned-medium dental pulp stem cells on the proliferation of PBMC. We observed that DPSC-CM could inhibit stimulated and non-stimulated PBMCs proliferation after 48 and 72 hours. There was no change in the proliferation of PBMCs after 24 hours.
In our previous study, we showed that DPSCs could inhibit the proliferation of PBMCs after 72 hours [15]. Tang et al. also reported that DPSCs had inhibitory effects on the proliferation of PBMCs [16]. Some studies reported that the conditioned-medium mesenchymal stem cells had anti-inflammatory effects [17, 18]. Yamaguchi and collogues showed that DPSCs-CM could reduce cardiac injury [19]. Moreover, MSCs-CM has some advantages in comparison with MSCs, like unchallenging production and delivery. Importantly, MSCs-CM are not rejected by the immune system.
On the whole, these data showed that the conditioned-medium mesenchymal stem cells have anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects and could be a potential therapeutic tool in regenerative medicine.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
There was no ethical considerations to be considered in this research.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors' contributions
Methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing review and editing: Nikoo Hossein-Khannazer; Supervision, software: Mandana Sattari; Supervision, funding acquisition: Arash Khojasteh; Methodology: Seye Mahmoud Hashemi; Supervision: Saeed Namaki.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.